Asyncio (or something better) for control of a vacuum system/components.
Marko Rauhamaa
marko at pacujo.net
Mon Mar 24 06:22:05 EDT 2014
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Mar 24 06:22:05 EDT 2014
- Previous message (by thread): Asyncio (or something better) for control of a vacuum system/components.
- Next message (by thread): Asyncio (or something better) for control of a vacuum system/components.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Shishir <shishirk at gmail.com>: > The problem is that self.execute() blocks and the asyncio framework > has no way to know how to reschedule it or bypass it. This can be > avoided if I depended on I/O from a file descriptor, on which I can > apply poll()/select(). But the channel handler that I have is more > generic (rs232() in code above). Deep down asyncio depends on file descriptors. If your thingy is another kind of object, it needs to go into its own process or thread. > A server sits on the computer which is connected to the devices via > channels (rs232, rs485, usb etc.). [...] Sounds about right. > I have looked around the web but couldn't find an easy+flexible > framework to do what I have outlined here. Asyncio + subprocess should be all you need for a framework. However, some system programming *will* be required. Marko
- Previous message (by thread): Asyncio (or something better) for control of a vacuum system/components.
- Next message (by thread): Asyncio (or something better) for control of a vacuum system/components.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list