optional types
Chris Angelico
rosuav at gmail.com
Wed Oct 29 14:03:33 EDT 2014
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Oct 29 14:03:33 EDT 2014
- Previous message (by thread): optional types
- Next message (by thread): optional types
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote: > Even if it becomes official, which seems likely, it will still be optional > -- hence, only useful if folks actually use it. ;) Yes, but if it's official, the standard library (large parts of it, at least) will use it, which will make it a lot more useful than it currently is. ChrisA
- Previous message (by thread): optional types
- Next message (by thread): optional types
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list