'Lite' Databases (Re: sqlite3 and dates)
Mark Lawrence
breamoreboy at yahoo.co.uk
Fri Feb 20 16:44:28 EST 2015
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Feb 20 16:44:28 EST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): 'Lite' Databases (Re: sqlite3 and dates)
- Next message (by thread): 'Lite' Databases (Re: sqlite3 and dates)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 20/02/2015 21:17, Paul Rubin wrote: > Ben Finney <ben+python at benfinney.id.au> writes: >> I don't know of a free-software concurrent RDBMS which can be considered >> lighter than that. (No, MySQL doesn't count; its concurrency is >> *unreliable* and it commonly loses data silently. Don't use MySQL.) > > I thought they fixed MySQL transactions years ago, with the InnoDB > engine. For some reason it's not the default, so you have to turn it on > explicitly: is there more to it than that? > > For stuff like browser bookmarks or other typical embedded database > purposes, I don't see why SQL or relations are needed. Berkeley DB is a > transactional key-value store that's been around for decades and is way > simpler than SQLite, and there's other things like that too. I thought I recognised the name, so a quick search and found it was deprecated in Python 2.6, removed from 3.0. Supported bindings available here https://www.jcea.es/programacion/pybsddb.htm for anybody who's interested. > > SQLite always seemed bloated (from the embedded NoSQL point of view) and > fragile to me, and the vendor plays an annoying anti-forking trick, > which is that the code is released but the developers' test suite is > secret and proprietary (can be licensed from them for big bucks). So if > you want to make your own version of SQLite you have to either pay for > the test suite, or have much less reliability assurance for your patched > version than the vendor has for their version. Add that Sqlite is > written in C (think of naked whirling razor blades) and you've got a > pretty serious disincentive against modification. > Thanks for the above. I've been meaning to take a look at how SQLite is tested for months if not years. That saves me the trouble :) -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence
- Previous message (by thread): 'Lite' Databases (Re: sqlite3 and dates)
- Next message (by thread): 'Lite' Databases (Re: sqlite3 and dates)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list