OT Re: Math-embarrassment results in CS [was: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed?]
Marko Rauhamaa
marko at pacujo.net
Thu Jul 23 17:59:53 EDT 2015
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Jul 23 17:59:53 EDT 2015
- Previous message (by thread): OT Re: Math-embarrassment results in CS [was: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed?]
- Next message (by thread): OT Re: Math-embarrassment results in CS [was: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Laura Creighton <lac at openend.se>: > In a message of Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:29:28 +0300, Marko Rauhamaa writes: >>At the time I was in college I heard topology was very fashionable >>among mathematicians. That was because it was one of the last >>remaining research topics that didn't yet have an application. > > I have a very good freind who is a knot-theorist. (Chad Musick, who > may have proven something wonderful.) see: > http://chadmusick.wikidot.com/knots He says there are lots of > applications for this in the field of circuit board layouts. And most > mathematicians accept knot-theory as part of topology. So topology, too, is lost. Marko
- Previous message (by thread): OT Re: Math-embarrassment results in CS [was: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed?]
- Next message (by thread): OT Re: Math-embarrassment results in CS [was: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list