Operator Precedence/Boolean Logic
Elizabeth Weiss
cake240 at gmail.com
Thu Jun 23 00:22:09 EDT 2016
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Jun 23 00:22:09 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): Operator Precedence/Boolean Logic
- Next message (by thread): Operator Precedence/Boolean Logic
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wednesday, June 22, 2016 at 3:42:24 AM UTC-4, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > On Wednesday, June 22, 2016 at 3:40:22 PM UTC+12, Elizabeth Weiss wrote: > > I am a little confused as to how this is False: > > > > False==(False or True) > > > > I would think it is True because False==False is true. > > > > I think the parenthesis are confusing me. > > No, it is the meanings of the boolean operators in Python. The rules are: > > * boolean operators don’t have to operate on boolean values. The language spec <https://docs.python.org/3/reference/expressions.html#boolean-operations> says: > > “...the following values are interpreted as false: False, None, numeric > zero of all types, and empty strings and containers (including strings, > tuples, lists, dictionaries, sets and frozensets). All other values are > interpreted as true.” > > I feel that’s a needlessly complicated rule. It would have been simpler if boolean operators (and conditional expressions like in if-statements and while-statements) only allowed values of boolean types. But that’s one of the few warts in the design of Python... > > * the meaning of “A or B” is: “return A if it evaluates to true, else return B”. Correspondingly, the meaning of “A and B” is: “return A if it evaluates to false, else return B”. > > Does that give you enough clues to understand what is going on? Thanks, Lawrence!
- Previous message (by thread): Operator Precedence/Boolean Logic
- Next message (by thread): Operator Precedence/Boolean Logic
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list