Pyhon 2.x or 3.x, which is faster?
Mark Lawrence
breamoreboy at yahoo.co.uk
Fri Mar 11 16:59:14 EST 2016
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Mar 11 16:59:14 EST 2016
- Previous message (by thread): Pyhon 2.x or 3.x, which is faster?
- Next message (by thread): Pyhon 2.x or 3.x, which is faster?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 11/03/2016 18:57, BartC wrote: > > Anyway, I've listed some of the stumbling blocks I think that Python has > in making it bit faster: http://pastebin.com/WfUfK3bc <quote> The String Append Benchmark This is a microbenchmark, but makes use of a technique I use extensively (creating a file for example by growing a string a character at a time). def test(): s="" for i in range(10000000): s+="*" print (len(s)) test() </quote> The minor snag that you might like to correct with your microbenchmark, which any experienced Python programmer knows, is that you *NEVER, EVER* create strings like this. Given that you've admitted earlier today that you couldn't get a simple slice to work, how much, if anything, do you actually know about Python? -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence
- Previous message (by thread): Pyhon 2.x or 3.x, which is faster?
- Next message (by thread): Pyhon 2.x or 3.x, which is faster?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list