The Cost of Dynamism (was Re: Pyhon 2.x or 3.x, which is faster?)
Mark Lawrence
breamoreboy at yahoo.co.uk
Mon Mar 14 17:00:18 EDT 2016
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Mon Mar 14 17:00:18 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): The Cost of Dynamism (was Re: Pyhon 2.x or 3.x, which is faster?)
- Next message (by thread): The Cost of Dynamism (was Re: Pyhon 2.x or 3.x, which is faster?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 14/03/2016 20:31, BartC wrote: > On 14/03/2016 19:45, alister wrote: >> On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:43:22 +0000, BartC wrote: >> >>> On 13/03/2016 09:39, Steven D'Aprano wrote: >>>> On Sun, 13 Mar 2016 04:54 am, BartC wrote: >>> >>>>> Common sense tells you it is unlikely. >>>> >>>> Perhaps your common sense is different from other people's common >>>> sense. To me, and many other Python programmers, it's common sense that >>>> being able to replace functions or methods on the fly is a useful >>>> feature worth having. More on this below. >>>> >>>> Perhaps this is an example of the "Blub Paradox": >>> >>> Perhaps it's time to talk about something which many languages have, but >>> Python hasn't. Not as far as I know anyway. >>> >>> That's references to names (sometimes called pointers). So if I write: >>> >>> a = 100 f(a) >>> >>> then function f gets passed the value that a refers to, or 100 in this >>> case. But how do you pass 'a' itself? > >> Congratulations >> you have just proven that you have faild in your understanimg of python @ >> stage 1 becuae you keep tying to us it a C >> >> try the following >> >> def test(x): >> print (id(x) >> >> a=100 >> print (id(a)) >> test(a) >> a="Oops i was an idiot" >> print (id(a)) >> test(a) >> >> python always passes the object bound to a, not the value of a or a >> pointer to a > > Yes, and? I colloquially used 'value' instead of 'object', 'id' or > 'reference'. The latter would added confusion as I'm talking about a > different kind of reference. And if you get rid of 'id' in your code, > you will get values displayed. > > But how do you pass something that refers to a itself? > > There are good reasons for wanting to do so. Try writing this function > in Python: > > def swap(a,b): > b,a = a,b > > x="one" > y="two" > swap(x,y) > > print (x,y) > > so that it displays "two" "one". > Global. -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence
- Previous message (by thread): The Cost of Dynamism (was Re: Pyhon 2.x or 3.x, which is faster?)
- Next message (by thread): The Cost of Dynamism (was Re: Pyhon 2.x or 3.x, which is faster?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list