sobering observation, python vs. perl
Charles T. Smith
cts.private.yahoo at gmail.com
Thu Mar 17 13:35:02 EDT 2016
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Thu Mar 17 13:35:02 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): sobering observation, python vs. perl
- Next message (by thread): sobering observation, python vs. perl
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:26:12 -0700, Ethan Furman wrote: > On 03/17/2016 09:36 AM, Charles T. Smith wrote: > >> Yes, your point was to forgo REs despite that they are useful. >> I could have thought the search would have been better as: >> >> 'release[-.:][Rr]eq' >> >> or something else ... you're in a "defend python at all costs!" mode. > > No, I'm in the "don't try to write <language X> in Python" mode, and > "don't use 10lb sledge when 6oz hammer will do" mode: Yes, fine. I'd only like to add that the perl numbers might also improve if the print in the loop were postponed.
- Previous message (by thread): sobering observation, python vs. perl
- Next message (by thread): sobering observation, python vs. perl
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list