Paul Rubin no.email at nospam.invalid
Fri Mar 25 22:59:23 EDT 2016

• Previous message (by thread): Undefined behaviour in C [was Re: The Cost of Dynamism]
• Next message (by thread): Undefined behaviour in C [was Re: The Cost of Dynamism]
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info> writes:
> Culturally, C compiler writers have a preference for using undefined
> behaviour to allow optimizations, even if it means changing the semantics
> of your code. 

If your code has UB then by definition it has no semantics to change.
Code with UB has no meaning.

---

• Previous message (by thread): Undefined behaviour in C [was Re: The Cost of Dynamism]
• Next message (by thread): Undefined behaviour in C [was Re: The Cost of Dynamism]
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Python-list mailing list