Undefined behaviour in C [was Re: The Cost of Dynamism]
BartC
bc at freeuk.com
Sun Mar 27 16:18:58 EDT 2016
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sun Mar 27 16:18:58 EDT 2016
- Previous message (by thread): Undefined behaviour in C [was Re: The Cost of Dynamism]
- Next message (by thread): Undefined behaviour in C [was Re: The Cost of Dynamism]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 27/03/2016 18:19, Ned Batchelder wrote: > On Sunday, March 27, 2016 at 12:58:23 PM UTC-4, BartC wrote: >> There would be a list of expression terms that can also form independent >> statements. Not knowing Python, the list would comprise function calls >> (ie. the function call is top node in the AST of the expression), and >> docstrings. > > It's a little frustrating to discuss language design when you claim not to > know Python. Perhaps you could devote some off-list time to learning it? :) Since the language is presumably available to anyone including non-experts, why shouldn't someone who is only going to use a subset, have an opinion on a troublesome part of the language? >>> One of Guido's principles in designing Python was to keep it simple, For a simple language, there appear to be quite a few esoteric uses being thought up for that feature! -- Bartc
- Previous message (by thread): Undefined behaviour in C [was Re: The Cost of Dynamism]
- Next message (by thread): Undefined behaviour in C [was Re: The Cost of Dynamism]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list