About the implementation of del in Python 3
Random832
random832 at fastmail.com
Fri Jul 7 11:44:11 EDT 2017
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Jul 7 11:44:11 EDT 2017
- Previous message (by thread): About the implementation of del in Python 3
- Next message (by thread): About the implementation of del in Python 3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017, at 04:12, Gregory Ewing wrote: > Only if you interpret the word "address" very narrowly. > > By the way, even the low-level notion of "address" that C > programs deal with is, on most modern hardware, a *virtual* > address that goes through a level of translation before it > identifies a physical set of transistors, and that mapping > can change as stuff gets paged in and out. So it's already > an abstract concept to some extent. What's not abstract is that if an object has address X and is N bytes long, those bytes (and any larger subobjects) occupy a contiguous range of addresses between X and X+(N-1). This is not required to be true of Python IDs.
- Previous message (by thread): About the implementation of del in Python 3
- Next message (by thread): About the implementation of del in Python 3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list