Pros and cons of Python sources?
nospam.nospam.Martin Schöön
martin.schoon at gmail.com
Sat Nov 25 17:00:00 EST 2017
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Sat Nov 25 17:00:00 EST 2017
- Previous message (by thread): Pros and cons of Python sources?
- Next message (by thread): Pros and cons of Python sources?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
(Martin =?UTF-8?Q?Sch=C3=B6=C3=B6n?=) Den 2017-11-26 skrev Cameron Simpson <cs at cskk.id.au>: > On 25Nov2017 08:34, rusi <rustompmody at gmail.com> wrote: >>On Saturday, November 25, 2017 at 9:45:07 PM UTC+5:30, Michael Torrie wrote: >>> The problem with mixing repository-installed packages with pip-installed >>> packages is that there's always a chance a Debian update will overwrite >>> a pip package, possibly with an older version. Or a pip-installed >>> package might bring in a new version that's not compatible with some >>> debian-installed package, breaking something. >> >>On (recent?) debian/ubuntu pip seems to use the 'user-scheme' >>which means pip runs without sudo and installs in ~/.local/lib >>So I dont believe literal overwriting would occur > > Though the point should be made that one should run pip as oneself, and try to > avoid doing it as the root user (including avoiding sudo). Many UNIX/Linux/etc > users believe "installs" should be done as root, and in this case that is > easily avoided, with all its potential for damage to the vendor supplied > environment. Hmm, I seem to remember not being able to install packages with pip unless I did sudo pip. Follow-up question: Is there a way to find out which packages were installed using pip and which are from Debian's repo? pip list seems to list everything. /Martin
- Previous message (by thread): Pros and cons of Python sources?
- Next message (by thread): Pros and cons of Python sources?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list