The "loop and a half"
bartc
bc at freeuk.com
Wed Oct 4 09:14:38 EDT 2017
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Wed Oct 4 09:14:38 EDT 2017
- Previous message (by thread): The "loop and a half"
- Next message (by thread): The "loop and a half"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 04/10/2017 14:02, Robin Becker wrote: > On 04/10/2017 11:57, Rhodri James wrote: >> On 04/10/17 10:01, Robin Becker wrote: >>> Given the prevalence of the loop and a half idea in python I wonder >>> why we don't have a "do" or "loop" statement to start loops without a >>> test. >> >> See PEP 315. Guido's rejection note is here: >> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2013-June/021610.html >> > seems fair enough; I suppose the cost is negligible or perhaps there's > peephole optimization for this common case. Read the thread. Not having a dedicated feature means I counted at least half a dozen different ideas for implementing what the OP really wanted to do, which was expressed using C-like syntax. None of which were as obvious. And that C-like one worked because it could use an assignment within a while-condition. -- bartc
- Previous message (by thread): The "loop and a half"
- Next message (by thread): The "loop and a half"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list