Interactive scripts (back on topic for once) [was Re: The "loop and a half"]
Chris Angelico
rosuav at gmail.com
Fri Oct 6 13:32:06 EDT 2017
More information about the Python-list mailing list
Fri Oct 6 13:32:06 EDT 2017
- Previous message (by thread): Interactive scripts (back on topic for once) [was Re: The "loop and a half"]
- Next message (by thread): Interactive scripts (back on topic for once) [was Re: The "loop and a half"]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 4:05 AM, Grant Edwards <grant.b.edwards at gmail.com> wrote: > On 2017-10-06, Thomas Jollans <tjol at tjol.eu> wrote: > >> Seriously? sys.stdin can be None? That's terrifying. > > Why? > > Unix daemons usually run with no stdin, stderr, or stdout. > > And yes, people do write Unix daemons in Python. Hmm, but usually I would expect them still to HAVE those streams, they're just connected to /dev/null or something. I don't think they would actually fail to exist, would they? ChrisA
- Previous message (by thread): Interactive scripts (back on topic for once) [was Re: The "loop and a half"]
- Next message (by thread): Interactive scripts (back on topic for once) [was Re: The "loop and a half"]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list