libiberty...
Richard Henderson
rth@cygnus.com
Mon Nov 22 15:57:00 GMT 1999
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Mon Nov 22 15:57:00 GMT 1999
- Previous message (by thread): libiberty...
- Next message (by thread): libiberty...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, Nov 20, 1999 at 11:28:47AM +0000, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > What do you mean we can't call it a "shared library system" if it doesn't > share code? Oh, hell! Let's call it a DLL then... It's not so bad as you make out -- if you compile with -fpic the code _does_ get shared. It's just that most ELF targets also allow non-pic code in shared libraries at a (possibly substantial) performance cost. Even then, if care is taken the linker can try to minimize the cost. E.g. by causing the direct call to go to a stub that does a proper PIC inter-module branch. r~
- Previous message (by thread): libiberty...
- Next message (by thread): libiberty...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list