Alan Modra alan@linuxcare.com.au
Tue Jul 4 04:23:00 GMT 2000

• Previous message (by thread): still reloc overflow?
• Next message (by thread): still reloc overflow?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, Frank van den Beuken wrote:

> However, I still have the "reloc overflow" that I hoped would be solved:
> /cadappl/gcc/2.95.2/i386-pc-mingw32/bin/as: transLALRParser.o: reloc
> overflow: 0x17681 > 0xffff
> transLALRParser.o: File truncated
> 
> I thought this was fixed, or is this not the same problem
> as mentioned in
> http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/binutils/2000-04/msg00223.html

No, that was an entirely different problem.  Your error message is
generated when the number of relocs is greater than the 16-bit field in 
the header can count.  It would probably be better if gas complained with
"too many relocs" in this case rather than "reloc overflow"

This bit of information doesn't help you with your problem, I'm afraid :-(

Alan Modra
-- 
Linuxcare.  Support for the Revolution.

---

• Previous message (by thread): still reloc overflow?
• Next message (by thread): still reloc overflow?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Binutils mailing list