(BFD): Non-byte addressing possible?
Ian Lance Taylor
ian@zembu.com
Fri Jul 14 10:27:00 GMT 2000
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Fri Jul 14 10:27:00 GMT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): gprof: bb counts
- Next message (by thread): (BFD): Non-byte addressing possible?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 16:21:16 +0200 From: Di Carlo Federico <dicarlo@apegate.roma1.infn.it> We are trying to port all binutils to our parallel-architecture machine. This architecture demands non per-byte addressing. In fact we have to provide address via a 32 bit bus referring 16 byte (a word, in this machine) with an address. For example if address 0x8000 is address 0x4000 for memory controller then address 0x8001 is address 0x4010 . So subseguent addresses refers to 128 different bits in memory. As far as we discovered it's not possible to force binutils (just BFD ELF support, we guess, due to relocs) to support this feature, so we think we'll have to do very strange magic translation at reloc/link time. Are there any features we didn't see or any back-end already using such an addressing we could study? See the tic54x and the octets_per_byte code. Perhaps it will help. Ian
- Previous message (by thread): gprof: bb counts
- Next message (by thread): (BFD): Non-byte addressing possible?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list