[EFifer@sanwaint.com: RE: binutils prerelease available for testing (feedback needed)]
Mark E.
snowball3@bigfoot.com
Thu Jul 20 12:59:00 GMT 2000
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Thu Jul 20 12:59:00 GMT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): [EFifer@sanwaint.com: RE: binutils prerelease available for testing (feedback needed)]
- Next message (by thread): [EFifer@sanwaint.com: RE: binutils prerelease available for testing (feedback needed)]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> : Danny Smith wrote: > : >But, rebuilding binutils-000718 after reverting the changes made to > : >gas/config/obj_coff.c > : >( http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2000-07/msg00226.html ) back to > : >binutils-000717 version, I can successfully build and link against dlls, > : >using either dllwrap or gcc -shared. > : > : Yes, rebuilding binutils-20000718-1 with the patch you mention > : reversed out, clears up the problems I'm seeing. Interesting. Most of the changes go along with what's already being done in the BFD version in obj_coff_endef . The first culprit I'd look would be this change: if (S_GET_STORAGE_CLASS (symp) == C_NULL) { if (!S_IS_DEFINED (symp) && !SF_GET_LOCAL (symp)) { assert (S_GET_VALUE (symp) == 0); S_SET_EXTERNAL (symp); } else if (S_GET_SEGMENT (symp) == text_section && symp != seg_info (text_section)->sym) { S_SET_STORAGE_CLASS (symp, C_LABEL); } else { S_SET_STORAGE_CLASS (symp, C_STAT); } }
- Previous message (by thread): [EFifer@sanwaint.com: RE: binutils prerelease available for testing (feedback needed)]
- Next message (by thread): [EFifer@sanwaint.com: RE: binutils prerelease available for testing (feedback needed)]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list