[RFA]: opcodes alpha disassembler
Chris G. Demetriou
cgd@sibyte.com
Fri Jul 21 13:03:00 GMT 2000
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Fri Jul 21 13:03:00 GMT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): [RFA]: opcodes alpha disassembler
- Next message (by thread): [RFA]: opcodes alpha disassembler
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michael Snyder <msnyder@cygnus.com> writes: > > Unless i'm mistaken, somebody (else?) also tried to get the table to > > include the OSF/1 PAL ops, recently, and was turned down. 8-) > > I think you're right, I'm just the messenger in this case. > Is there a reason why these can't go in? I don't really care; i was just pointing it out in case you'd missed it. > > Obviously, a question that needs to be asked is, "what about the VMS > > and NT PAL call ops?" > > With respect, I don't care about those. ;-) > But it would help me if I could get these in. > Do these do any harm? depends on what you care about. 8-) If you have to disassemble code which uses the VMS or NT PAL calls, rather than the OSF/1 PAL calls, then yes, the diff does do harm (by providing the 'wrong' disassembly). Whether that harm is enough to worry about is something for somebody else to decide. (Personally, I've wished for OSF/1 PAL call disassembly, but...) chris
- Previous message (by thread): [RFA]: opcodes alpha disassembler
- Next message (by thread): [RFA]: opcodes alpha disassembler
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list