$(build_tooldir)/lib (was Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-05/msg01104.html)
Geoff Keating
geoffk@cygnus.com
Fri Jul 21 15:12:00 GMT 2000
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Fri Jul 21 15:12:00 GMT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): $(build_tooldir)/lib (was Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-05/msg01104.html)
- Next message (by thread): $(build_tooldir)/lib (was Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-05/msg01104.html)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> cc: jason@redhat.com, hjl@lucon.org, aoliva@cygnus.com, > gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com, > angela@cygnus.com > Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 15:05:49 -0700 > From: Jim Wilson <wilson@cygnus.com> > > I wouldn't try to do much work in this area for a bit. Red Hat is > working on some major changes to how hostXhost toolchains work. > > Presumably this is the stuff that Brendan Kehoe started? He did post a patch > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-01/msg00641.html > but the current stuff might be a bit different as that was 6 months ago. > It would be useful to know if this mechanism works for H.J. as he has his > own contraints that are rather different from ours. It's quite a bit changed from Brendan's work. I don't know what HJ's constraints are, so I don't know if it will suit HJ. If I was trying to develop a single-tree cross environment, I wouldn't do it the way HJ seems to be doing it. Perhaps HJ can explain more? -- - Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@cygnus.com>
- Previous message (by thread): $(build_tooldir)/lib (was Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-05/msg01104.html)
- Next message (by thread): $(build_tooldir)/lib (was Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-05/msg01104.html)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list