glibc 2.1 and gabi
Nick Clifton
nickc@cygnus.com
Mon Jul 24 10:52:00 GMT 2000
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Mon Jul 24 10:52:00 GMT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): glibc 2.1 and gabi
- Next message (by thread): [EFifer@sanwaint.com: RE: binutils prerelease available for testing (feedback needed)]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi H.J., Hi Andrew, : > > --disable-new-dynamic-tags : > > --enable-new-dynamic-tags : > : > Um, do you really want to call something ``new''. Similar to the : > comment I just posted to GCC-patches, it will be old soon enough. : : I don't mind too much about a different choice. You have to ask Nick. : But that means we have to change glibc since it has used it already. : If we make the change now, I hope it won't be too bad. It is not important enough to be worth changing now, so lets leave things as they are. I do agree with Andrew's point though, so in the future lets see if we can try to avoid using 'new' in situations like this. Cheers Nick
- Previous message (by thread): glibc 2.1 and gabi
- Next message (by thread): [EFifer@sanwaint.com: RE: binutils prerelease available for testing (feedback needed)]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list