My i386-pc-pe-coff pacth to gas/configure.in [Re: Can we emulate i386-pc-pe-coff with i386coff?]
H . J . Lu
hjl@valinux.com
Sun Jun 18 09:41:00 GMT 2000
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Sun Jun 18 09:41:00 GMT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): Can we emulate i386-pc-pe-coff with i386coff?
- Next message (by thread): My i386-pc-pe-coff pacth to gas/configure.in [Re: Can we emulate i386-pc-pe-coff with i386coff?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 12:47:56PM +1000, Alan Modra wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, H . J . Lu wrote: > > > I don't think we can emulate i386-pc-pe-coff with i386coff. I don't > > even know we can emulate i386-pc-pe-coff at all. The problem is > > config/tc-i386.c has #ifdef TE_PE inside. We need to modify it to > > check TE_PE at the runtime or do something else. Anyway, this patch > > disable the i386coff emulation for i386-pc-pe-coff. > > Agreed. I dislike all those #ifdefs. What's really needed is an overhaul > of the generic reloc handling code so that all the back-end fudges can be > removed. A major undertaking. > I haven't heard any comments on my patch. Is that ok with everyone? -- H.J. Lu (hjl@gnu.org)
- Previous message (by thread): Can we emulate i386-pc-pe-coff with i386coff?
- Next message (by thread): My i386-pc-pe-coff pacth to gas/configure.in [Re: Can we emulate i386-pc-pe-coff with i386coff?]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list