[rfa] bfd_elf_sign_extend_vma()
Andrew Cagney
ac131313@cygnus.com
Fri Jun 23 01:35:00 GMT 2000
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Fri Jun 23 01:35:00 GMT 2000
- Previous message (by thread): [rfa] bfd_elf_sign_extend_vma()
- Next message (by thread): [rfa] bfd_elf_sign_extend_vma()
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alan Modra wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Jun 2000, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > > Its fairly consistent with bfd_elf_get_addr_size() which returns the > > address size or -1 on error. If you've a better suggestion I'd be > > interested? I can't throw an error :-) > > No, I don't have a better suggestion. I suppose you will just need to > write "if (bfd_elf_sign_extend_vma () == 1)". ie. don't write > "... == true" as that infers the function returns a boolean. Someone > is sure to later decide that "if (looks_like_bool_func () == true)" is bad > C style and rewrite it as "if (looks_like_bool_func ())" FYI, I had one thought - add address read/write methods to the BFD target. Andrew
- Previous message (by thread): [rfa] bfd_elf_sign_extend_vma()
- Next message (by thread): [rfa] bfd_elf_sign_extend_vma()
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list