testsuite: selective.exp for mips targets
Jack Tihon
jack@clearwaternetworks.com
Thu Dec 6 10:31:00 GMT 2001
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Thu Dec 6 10:31:00 GMT 2001
- Previous message (by thread): testsuite: selective.exp for mips targets
- Next message (by thread): I can not configure binutils
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
From looking at ld/testsuite/ld-selective/selective.exp further, I've made the following analysis. The tests in selective.exp test ld's selective linking. It sets the following generic options, which shed light on the tests: set cflags "-w -O -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections" set cxxflags "-fvtable-gc -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti" set ldflags "--gc-sections -Bstatic" I think the most interesting thing is the "--gc-sections" argument to ldflags. From looking at the 6 tests run, It seems that it's testing a few variations of the ld garbage-collection. most of the mips*-* targets, however, are set to XFAIL. Did mips*-* binutils not support this feature when it was created? I also noticed that the ToT test expects demangled C++ names and passes nm the "--demangle" flag, so I guess the binutils tests could pass if I supplied a working C++ cross-compiler to dejagnu. So, I guess my only question is whether or not it is still valid to XFAIL mips*-* targets for the tests? thanks, -jack Eric Christopher wrote: >>Can someone please clarify? >> >Not certain at the moment, it was before my time. Hopefully someone else >can chime in who was around then. > >-eric >
- Previous message (by thread): testsuite: selective.exp for mips targets
- Next message (by thread): I can not configure binutils
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list