ebcdic support for binutils...
Ian Lance Taylor
ian@airs.com
Tue Dec 11 23:30:00 GMT 2001
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Tue Dec 11 23:30:00 GMT 2001
- Previous message (by thread): ebcdic support for binutils...
- Next message (by thread): ebcdic support for binutils...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
esp5@rama.comp.pge.com writes: > hm. That's better? What happens when you get 50 different charsets? Since that will never happen, the question is pointless. We've had two character sets used in programming languages for 30 years, and one of them is almost never used and only exists today for reasons of backward compatibility. It's hard to imagine introducing even a third character set, much less fifty. (Note that, obviously, the character set used in a programming language is only slightly related to the character sets used for I/O. There are a number of character sets used for I/O, although since most are a slice of ISO 10646 there may still be less than fifty overall.) Ian
- Previous message (by thread): ebcdic support for binutils...
- Next message (by thread): ebcdic support for binutils...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list