R_SPARC_RELATIVE vs R_SPARC_UA32 & unaligned unwind tables
Alan Modra
amodra@bigpond.net.au
Tue Dec 18 19:03:00 GMT 2001
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Tue Dec 18 19:03:00 GMT 2001
- Previous message (by thread): R_SPARC_RELATIVE vs R_SPARC_UA32 & unaligned unwind tables - again
- Next message (by thread): R_SPARC_RELATIVE vs R_SPARC_UA32 & unaligned unwind tables - again
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 09:31:35PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote: > > Ok, I seem to have bumped into a "this just isn't possible" scenario. Hmm. Latest CVS binutils should only use R_SPARC_RELATIVE if the offset is suitable. See elf32-sparc.c:1455
- Previous message (by thread): R_SPARC_RELATIVE vs R_SPARC_UA32 & unaligned unwind tables - again
- Next message (by thread): R_SPARC_RELATIVE vs R_SPARC_UA32 & unaligned unwind tables - again
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list