some weirdness/slippage on RTEMS targets
Joel Sherrill
joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com
Fri Feb 9 11:50:00 GMT 2001
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Fri Feb 9 11:50:00 GMT 2001
- Previous message (by thread): SH assembler emits incorrect warnings
- Next message (by thread): some weirdness/slippage on RTEMS targets
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I am testing the CVS sources on RTEMS targets and of the 3 I have tried to build, two have changed object formats since binutils since 2.10. Specifically m68k-rtems and i386-rtems are supposed to be ELF and were so in binutils 2.10. In the CVS source I checked out a couple of days ago, they are back to coff per config.bfd, ld/configure.tgt, and gas/configure.in. Is this an issue that the RTEMS patches that changed most default formats to elf are actually on the binutils 2.10 branch? I am happy to generate a patch to fix this but I am a bit concerned about why it is needed and if something else got broken at the same time. Thanks. -- Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development joel@OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805 Support Available (256) 722-9985
- Previous message (by thread): SH assembler emits incorrect warnings
- Next message (by thread): some weirdness/slippage on RTEMS targets
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list