More i386 architectures?
Andrew Cagney
ac131313@cygnus.com
Fri Nov 2 10:05:00 GMT 2001
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Fri Nov 2 10:05:00 GMT 2001
- Previous message (by thread): More i386 architectures?
- Next message (by thread): More i386 architectures?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 08:32:53PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >> As part of this, GDB uses BFD's archures to identify ISA variants. >> Unfortunatly, looking at the i386, things are pretty thin on the ground >> - only i8086 and i386 are present. >> >> Does anyone object to me padding this out with (at a guess): >> >> ..._i386sx >> ..._i386_p1 >> ..._i386_p1_mmx >> ..._i386_p2 >> ..._i386_p3 >> ..._i386_p4 > > > That's going to be intractable. You'd be much better off using > the CPUID flags that identify the set of ISA extensions that the > cpu supports. Sorry you've lost me here. I'm refering to a data structure provided by BFD and used by GDB to identify architectures and architecture variants. GDB might, where pratical, use this CPUID flag to select the architecture but that is a separate problem. Andrew
- Previous message (by thread): More i386 architectures?
- Next message (by thread): More i386 architectures?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list