Binutils checkin policy (Re: i386 gas is broken)
Hans-Peter Nilsson
hp@bitrange.com
Mon Nov 5 07:17:00 GMT 2001
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Mon Nov 5 07:17:00 GMT 2001
- Previous message (by thread): Binutils checkin policy (Re: i386 gas is broken)
- Next message (by thread): Binutils checkin policy (Re: i386 gas is broken)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, H . J . Lu wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 06:30:50PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote: > > What fun! Corrupted frag chain, so something is scribbling where it > > shouldn't. More fallout from 2001-11-14 Daniel Jacobowitz, I think. There were no gas patches in there, so it's less likely than the last days gas changes. > I'd like to suggest a policy that any non-minor changes to binutils > should pass > > # .../configure --enable-targets=all --enable-64-bit-bfd > # make > # make check > > on Linux/x86. (I guess you mean --target=i686-pc-linux-gnu if that's not the host system.) A couple of cross-builds with make check before and after the patch won't hurt either, in addition to or in place of a native make check. When the patch causing breakage is identified, I suggest we revert it, and let the author debug it. FWIW, I see major breakdown in simulator builds which can be explained by a fragged frag chain (as crashes in those ways). Only h8300-hms seems to have survived a complete build. There's another coff target that didn't, i960-coff. brgds, H-P
- Previous message (by thread): Binutils checkin policy (Re: i386 gas is broken)
- Next message (by thread): Binutils checkin policy (Re: i386 gas is broken)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list