[Patch] updated ltcf-*.sh, ltconfig, ltmain.sh
Andrew Cagney
ac131313@cygnus.com
Tue Nov 6 05:03:00 GMT 2001
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Tue Nov 6 05:03:00 GMT 2001
- Previous message (by thread): [Patch] updated ltcf-*.sh, ltconfig, ltmain.sh
- Next message (by thread): [Patch] updated ltcf-*.sh, ltconfig, ltmain.sh
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>> Is there a reason for pulling in GCC's hacks rather than going to the >> official version per src/MAINTAINERS: >> >> ltconfig; ltmain.sh >> libtool: http://gnu.org >> Changes need to be done in tandem with the official LIBTOOL >> sources or submitted to the master file maintainer and brought >> in via a merge. > > > It was my impression from Alexandre that he had already imported these > changes from the official sources into gcc's tree. For some reason, they > weren't imported into the binutils/gdb tree at that time. Ok, so now that the change is committed to the master repository, it can be committed locally. Can the ``gcc-local'' bit be clarified - it is no longer gcc-local. Rather it was an accelerated patch brought in from the master repository. Andrew
- Previous message (by thread): [Patch] updated ltcf-*.sh, ltconfig, ltmain.sh
- Next message (by thread): [Patch] updated ltcf-*.sh, ltconfig, ltmain.sh
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list