binutils patches for Cirrus/arm9e/maverick support
Richard Earnshaw
rearnsha@arm.com
Thu Oct 11 08:07:00 GMT 2001
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Thu Oct 11 08:07:00 GMT 2001
- Previous message (by thread): binutils patches for Cirrus/arm9e/maverick support
- Next message (by thread): binutils patches for Cirrus/arm9e/maverick support
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > > But, from reading the code, I'm sure if you put in > > > > cfmvsr r0, mvf5 > > or > > cfmvsr mvdx0, r1 > > or > > cfmvsr dspsc, r0 > > > > or a number of other invalid operations, then the assembler will fail to > > diagnose the mistake. > > well, since you are rewriting > the code there's no sense in me fixing it in the current sources right? True, provided I can work out what is supposed to be correct and what isn't. Without the specs it's going to be much more work than I'd planned for, which is going to delay me feeding back my changes... :-( R.
- Previous message (by thread): binutils patches for Cirrus/arm9e/maverick support
- Next message (by thread): binutils patches for Cirrus/arm9e/maverick support
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list