Doug Evans dje@transmeta.com
Fri Feb 1 16:46:00 GMT 2002

• Previous message (by thread): [PATCH RFA] More stdbool.h fallout
• Next message (by thread): [PATCH RFA] More stdbool.h fallout
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

Jason R Thorpe writes:
 > Testing for the presence of a header based on compiler version
 > seems highly bogus.  It also make BFD fail to compile on the
 > current development version of NetBSD.
 > 
 > The following patch also makes sure <stdbool.h> actually exists
 > before trying to include it.
 > 
 > OK to commit?
 > 
 > 	* bfd-in.h: Don't include <stdbool.h> unless HAVE_STDBOOL_H
 > 	is defined.
 > 	* bfd-in2.h: Regenerate.
 > 	* configure.in: Check for the existence of <stdbool.h>.
 > 	* configure: Regenerate.

I'm confused.  Someone said autoconfigure checks were verboten for bfd.h.

---

• Previous message (by thread): [PATCH RFA] More stdbool.h fallout
• Next message (by thread): [PATCH RFA] More stdbool.h fallout
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Binutils mailing list