include/dis-asm.h patch for cgen disassemblers
Andrew Cagney
ac131313@cygnus.com
Mon Feb 4 18:17:00 GMT 2002
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Mon Feb 4 18:17:00 GMT 2002
- Previous message (by thread): include/dis-asm.h patch for cgen disassemblers
- Next message (by thread): include/dis-asm.h patch for cgen disassemblers
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> I'm contending that this is correctly modeled within BFD as separate >> BFD_ARCH's. If it isn't then the documentation, at least, for BFD is wrong. >> >> You appear to contend that it is correctly modeled as a single bfd_arch >> and a number of different bfd_machs. [...] > > > It is correct in the sense that it works (and has been working for, oh, > three years now?), it's reasonably compact in code, and it doesn't obviously > contradict any important rules. If you prefer a new "correctness" criterion > that it fails, the it's not "correct", but the onus is on you to justify your > criterion. You pointed at multi-arch. Yes, GDB refuses non-multi-arch targets. As much as anything it is because non-multi-arch targets have a significantly higher maintenance overhead and there is little benefit in having the GDB community take on the extra burdon of maintainging such code. On the other hand people are free to develope non-multi-arch targets and distribute them. The code might work but that certainly doesn't make it either correct or suitable for integration into GDB. enjoy, Andrew
- Previous message (by thread): include/dis-asm.h patch for cgen disassemblers
- Next message (by thread): include/dis-asm.h patch for cgen disassemblers
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list