[RFA:] ld section location mishap. Attention PE, HPPA, PPC64.
Daniel Jacobowitz
drow@mvista.com
Tue Feb 5 08:30:00 GMT 2002
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Tue Feb 5 08:30:00 GMT 2002
- Previous message (by thread): [RFA:] ld section location mishap. Attention PE, HPPA, PPC64.
- Next message (by thread): [RFA:] ld section location mishap. Attention PE, HPPA, PPC64.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 08:24:23AM +0100, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > > Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 22:44:46 -0500 > > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> > > > On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 03:01:43AM +0100, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > > > The same problem seems to exist for other callers: pe-dll.c > > > (twice), emultempl/hppaelf.em and emultempl/ppc64elf.em. I > > > leave those to the respective maintainer. (Sorry.) > > > > Was this introduced recently? > > It seems it was introduced by: > > 2001-11-14 Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> > > * emultempl/elf32.em (gld${EMULATION_NAME}_finish): New. > (struct ld_emulation_xfer_struct): Use it. > :-) > > If you mean reset_memory_regions, it and its call in > lang_process was introduced 1995 it seems. That's what I meant :) > > And HPPA almost certainly has the same > > problem, > > Other than emultempl/hppaelf.em as I indicated? No, I was just agreeing with you. What's the issue in pe-dll.c (and can you fix that one as simply also)? -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
- Previous message (by thread): [RFA:] ld section location mishap. Attention PE, HPPA, PPC64.
- Next message (by thread): [RFA:] ld section location mishap. Attention PE, HPPA, PPC64.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list