Home Original page

sh64-elf (SH5) port: directory opcodes

Hans-Peter Nilsson hp@bitrange.com
Tue Feb 5 11:20:00 GMT 2002 
On 5 Feb 2002, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Feb  5, 2002, Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com> wrote:
> > Anyway, if you always include support for all the SH variants, does
> > anything break?
>
> Probably not, since --enable-targets=all works.

Though you'd bloat binutils for people with sh[1-4] only.  Some
SH targets run native in limited systems, I've heard.  Can we
ignore the bloat issue?

Maybe let sh-elf imply bfd+opcodes for sh[1-5] and leave
sh[1-4][hl]* the way it is?

(Including opcodes but not bfd seems useless.  You can't get a
sh5 bfd, so you can't (without tricks) invoke the disassembler
AFAICT.)

brgds, H-P
More information about the Binutils mailing list