sh64-elf (SH5) port: directory opcodes
Alexandre Oliva
aoliva@redhat.com
Fri Feb 8 17:54:00 GMT 2002
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Fri Feb 8 17:54:00 GMT 2002
- Previous message (by thread): sh64-elf (SH5) port: directory opcodes
- Next message (by thread): sh64-elf (SH5) port: directory opcodes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Feb 8, 2002, Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com> wrote: >> By default having all of them is significantly better (I think). It >> would also better integrate into GDB. > Is that an agreement to keep it in "sh" and keeping it out of > sh[1-4]{le,be} ? I had understood it as such, and was about to start implementing this change. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer
- Previous message (by thread): sh64-elf (SH5) port: directory opcodes
- Next message (by thread): sh64-elf (SH5) port: directory opcodes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list