Hans-Peter Nilsson hp@bitrange.com
Sun Feb 10 07:40:00 GMT 2002

• Previous message (by thread): sh64-elf (SH5) port: directory opcodes
• Next message (by thread): sh64-elf (SH5) port: directory opcodes
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> On 8 Feb 2002, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> > On Feb  8, 2002, Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com> wrote:
> > > Is that an agreement to keep it in "sh" and keeping it out of
> > > sh[1-4]{le,be} ?
> >
> > How's this?  Ok to install?  If I don't read objections, I'll check it
> > in soon.
>
> I have no objections to that patch.

(That is,
<URL:http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-02/msg00277.html>)

... except that it broke sh-elf, because the corresponding bfd
changes weren't done.  When linking objdump:

../opcodes/.libs/libopcodes.a(sh64-dis.o): In function
`sh64_get_contents_type_disasm':
opcodes/sh64-dis.c:481:
undefined reference to `sh64_get_contents_type'
opcodes/sh64-dis.c:495:
undefined reference to `sh64_get_contents_type'

brgds, H-P

---

• Previous message (by thread): sh64-elf (SH5) port: directory opcodes
• Next message (by thread): sh64-elf (SH5) port: directory opcodes
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Binutils mailing list