how close to binutils-2.12 previews
Thiemo Seufer
ica2_ts@csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de
Fri Feb 15 15:24:00 GMT 2002
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Fri Feb 15 15:24:00 GMT 2002
- Previous message (by thread): how close to binutils-2.12 previews
- Next message (by thread): how close to binutils-2.12 previews
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Eric Christopher wrote: > Macej, > So, I'm going to go with Thiemo's comments on this and ask that most of > the patch be delayed while we wait for him to finish 64-bit support for > mips. As Thiemo said the checking for la and dla based on > register/address size causes (I believe valid) testsuite failures. To be clear about this: The warning output introduced by the patch causes the testsuite failures, which means the testsuite should be fixed. Such code went through unchecked before, even if it was harmful. > It > could warn erroneously as well (I'm thinking of a 64-bit arch with > -mgp32, as well as, the n32 case or even a 64-bit arch with a 32-bit > pointer range). The code snippet I posted in reply to Maciej should solve this at the price of dropping the warning for n32 and alike. Thiemo
- Previous message (by thread): how close to binutils-2.12 previews
- Next message (by thread): how close to binutils-2.12 previews
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list