sh-hms does not build on the release branch
Ralf Corsepius
corsepiu@faw.uni-ulm.de
Fri Feb 15 23:42:00 GMT 2002
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Fri Feb 15 23:42:00 GMT 2002
- Previous message (by thread): sh-hms does not build on the release branch
- Next message (by thread): cross target status report for 2.12 branch
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Am Fre, 2002-02-15 um 20.03 schrieb Daniel Jacobowitz: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 12:46:17PM -0600, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > Nothing weird on this failure. :) > > > > sh-coff, sh-elf, sh-rtems, sh-rtemself all build OK > > > > sh-hms fails trying to link gas with an undefined > > reference to md_pcrel_from in fixup_segment() in > > the file obj-coff.c:4397 > > > > With a quick glance, I don't see anything special > > for sh-hms not even a configure stanza. It must > > be using some default sh-*-* that is not the same > > as sh-coff. But my grep for sh-*-* shows it often > > on the same line as sh-rtems so I am perplexed. > > Ah, I suspected it might not build. sh-hms confuses me. I see > configure triplets for it being added in the changelogs, but I don't > see when they disappeared again. It appears to be a COFF target, but > unlike sh-elf and sh-coff bfd_gas is never set. That may be the > problem.... sh-hms had been the sh-coff GNU-toolchain variant provided by/for Hitachi (hms = Hitachi Micro Systems). IIRC [1], except for the name, there had not been any differences to sh-coff in binutils and only very few minor differences in gcc/newlib. > Is sh-hms still a supported target? Dunno. Ralf [1] I had used it, when getting started with SH1s ca. 4-5 years ago and still have
- Previous message (by thread): sh-hms does not build on the release branch
- Next message (by thread): cross target status report for 2.12 branch
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list