selective.exp xfails
H . J . Lu
hjl@lucon.org
Sun Feb 17 23:29:00 GMT 2002
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Sun Feb 17 23:29:00 GMT 2002
- Previous message (by thread): selective.exp xfails
- Next message (by thread): selective.exp xfails
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 01:28:39PM +1100, Ben Elliston wrote: > Hi HJ, > > I discovered today that the following changes were made to ld's > selective.exp test case last year: > > 2001-07-12 H.J. Lu <hjl@gnu.org> > > * ld-selective/selective.exp: Mark selective1, selective2, > selective4 and selective5 xfail on alpha*-*. > > 2001-06-06 H.J. Lu <hjl@gnu.org> > > * ld-selective/selective.exp: Mark selective2, selective3, > selective4 and selective5 xfail on Linux/mips. > > I have a couple of questions about these patches: > > + Why are all Alpha targets XFAILed? I don't think alpha supports garbage collection. > > + If the intention is to XFAIL the tests on Linux/mips, why does the > patch XFAIL "mips*-*"? There are embedded MIPS targets where this > test will pass. Frankly, I wonder how this particular patch was > accepted into the tree. > > + Why does this test fail specifically on {alpha,mips*}-linux-* > systems, anyway? If it fails, it seems to me that it is a genuine > failure. I don't think mips supports garbage collection either. H.J.
- Previous message (by thread): selective.exp xfails
- Next message (by thread): selective.exp xfails
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list