cross binutils 2.12 test summary
Alexandre Oliva
aoliva@redhat.com
Thu Feb 21 22:16:00 GMT 2002
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Thu Feb 21 22:16:00 GMT 2002
- Previous message (by thread): cross binutils 2.12 test summary
- Next message (by thread): m68k-as and MRI compatibility
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Feb 21, 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> wrote: >> sh-hms - previously reported > I think sh-hms is just a configury problem. No one has commented, but > my guess is that it should really be an alias for sh-coff. Me too, but I won't claim to have ever understood the point behind sh-hms. I've always used sh-coff myself. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer
- Previous message (by thread): cross binutils 2.12 test summary
- Next message (by thread): m68k-as and MRI compatibility
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list