gas symbols.c functions
Alan Modra
amodra@bigpond.net.au
Thu Feb 21 23:50:00 GMT 2002
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Thu Feb 21 23:50:00 GMT 2002
- Previous message (by thread): gas symbols.c functions
- Next message (by thread): sources.redhat.com totally unusable after 6pm!!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 01:48:21PM +1100, Ben Elliston wrote: > These are all functions, yet are named as if they might be macros or > enum constants (in violation of the GNU coding standard). Ideally, > these functions should also be prefixed with `symbol', not `s'. If > this was done, the patch would be *huge*. Comments? Grin. I suppose you could rename the functions in symbols.c, and then define macros like #define S_IS_FUNCTION symbol_is_function That should satisfy the standard without a huge patch. Seriously, many of these functions are macros in old non-bfd targets. And no, I don't advocate more macros. Alan
- Previous message (by thread): gas symbols.c functions
- Next message (by thread): sources.redhat.com totally unusable after 6pm!!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list