[David Mosberger <davidm@hpl.hp.com>] problem with unwind info for .init/.fini sections
H . J . Lu
hjl@lucon.org
Thu Feb 28 17:43:00 GMT 2002
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Thu Feb 28 17:43:00 GMT 2002
- Previous message (by thread): [David Mosberger <davidm@hpl.hp.com>] problem with unwind info for .init/.fini sections
- Next message (by thread): [David Mosberger <davidm@hpl.hp.com>] problem with unwind info for .init/.fini sections
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 05:19:35PM -0800, David Mosberger wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 16:58:52 -0800, "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> said: > > HJ> I am not sure if .init_array/.fini_array are supported. It will > HJ> be nice to add them to binutils. > > >From my point of view, it's more worthwhile to spend time on getting > .init_array/.fini_array supported than trying to fix up .init/.fini. > I'm willing to help with such an effort, but I probably would need a > fair amount of help (or at least support) from the glibc and binutils > maintainers. Anyone else willing to help with this? > I believe glibc is ok. The problem is binutils. I didn't see any supports for DT_INIT_ARRAY, DT_FINI_ARRAY. DT_INIT_ARRAYSZ, DT_FINI_ARRAYSZ, DT_PREINIT_ARRAY nor DT_PREINIT_ARRAYSZ. H.J.
- Previous message (by thread): [David Mosberger <davidm@hpl.hp.com>] problem with unwind info for .init/.fini sections
- Next message (by thread): [David Mosberger <davidm@hpl.hp.com>] problem with unwind info for .init/.fini sections
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list