SHT_GROUP Support in binutils
Jessica Han
jessica@cup.hp.com
Tue Jan 8 10:40:00 GMT 2002
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Tue Jan 8 10:40:00 GMT 2002
- Previous message (by thread): SHT_GROUP Support in binutils
- Next message (by thread): Prelink for mips (Re: MIPS broken in 2.3)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thanks for the response. eh_frame is new to me, I am trying to find the section group information for Vague Linkage (COMDAT Sections) in IA64-ABI. -----Original Message----- From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:jakub@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 3:16 AM To: Jessica Han; binutils@sources.redhat.com; reva@cup.hp.com; sje@cup.hp.com Subject: Re: SHT_GROUP Support in binutils On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 09:32:55PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 10:14:48AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > Why is it needed > > It isn't needed for eh_frame now, which is another reason why I haven't > continued with the gcc patch. There may be other good uses for > section groups though. Of course, I just mentioned it because .-foo is no longer problem... Jakub
- Previous message (by thread): SHT_GROUP Support in binutils
- Next message (by thread): Prelink for mips (Re: MIPS broken in 2.3)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list