[patch] '0x' prefix on objdump addresses
LeakyStain
leakstan@erols.com
Thu Jan 10 16:29:00 GMT 2002
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Thu Jan 10 16:29:00 GMT 2002
- Previous message (by thread): [patch] '0x' prefix on objdump addresses
- Next message (by thread): [patch] '0x' prefix on objdump addresses
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I would strongly argue against this trivial change; it is not worth the trouble. I have test suites that would break. And besides, the _correct_ syntax for a hex number is 16#abcd# :) (from Ada, the world's best language :). If you _really_ want a different output syntax, put in an option to enable it. -- Stephe Graydon Hoare wrote: > > On Thu, 2002-01-10 at 16:38, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > > On 10 Jan 2002, Graydon Hoare wrote: > > > The biggest problem I can forsee is the large-ish number of testsuites > > > this would trivially invalidate. The whole gas suite, at least, would > > > need adjusting. Any volunteers? > > > > Aren't you supposed to fix any breakages in the test-suite (gas > > and ld, maybe elsewhere) when you change objdump output? > > yes, of course. I really just want to double-check with the wider > objdump user/developer community to ensure the work is not the sort of > thing someone is going to immediately undo, if I happen to do it; and > perhaps raise anyone's antennae if they think their own testsuites, > outside the typical toolchain suites, are going to break. > > -graydon
- Previous message (by thread): [patch] '0x' prefix on objdump addresses
- Next message (by thread): [patch] '0x' prefix on objdump addresses
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list