Home Original page

Possibly unnecessary differences in messages

Richard Earnshaw rearnsha@arm.com
Tue Jan 29 11:16:00 GMT 2002 
> As far as I can tell (I have nearly no knowledge of ARM), the code does the same
> thing and only uses slightly different wording for the message, correct?

I believe so, yes.

> If
> so, the messages should be identical, and the only question would be which
> of the two should be used.

Yes.

> BTW, at least the messages dealing with the interwork flag differ slightly between
> elf32-arm.h and coff-arm.c. One example is in the above snippets which use
> 'interworking flag' and 'interwork flag' respectively. I'd also like to get
> those messages in sync if that's OK with you. If yes, should I use interwork
> flag or interworking flag.
> 

I think "interworking flag" is correct.

R.
More information about the Binutils mailing list