PATCH, Re: gprof failed to compile
Doug Evans
dje@transmeta.com
Thu Jan 31 09:02:00 GMT 2002
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Thu Jan 31 09:02:00 GMT 2002
- Previous message (by thread): PATCH, Re: gprof failed to compile
- Next message (by thread): PATCH, Re: gprof failed to compile
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > The whole point was that we may now typedef bool in "bfd.h". Defining `bool' in any application-specific header seems wrong. Why not move it to its own file (given that stdbool.h is the way it is)? One might even put that file in devo/include (or is that toplevel/include :-). One could then conditionalize its usage on AC_CHECK_HEADER(stdbool.h) (plus additional smarts as necessary). Just a half-thought-out idea.
- Previous message (by thread): PATCH, Re: gprof failed to compile
- Next message (by thread): PATCH, Re: gprof failed to compile
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list