[chj: Can't build libgcc/unwind-sjlj.o on neither gcc-3.1 or gcc-3.2 branch using binutils cvs (neither main branch nor 2.12)]

[chj: Can't build libgcc/unwind-sjlj.o on neither gcc-3.1 or gcc-3.2 branch using binutils cvs (neither main branch nor 2.12)]

H . J . Lu hjl@lucon.org
Sat Mar 2 14:25:00 GMT 2002

Previous message (by thread): [chj: Can't build libgcc/unwind-sjlj.o on neither gcc-3.1 or gcc-3.2 branch using binutils cvs (neither main branch nor 2.12)]
Next message (by thread): [chj: Can't build libgcc/unwind-sjlj.o on neither gcc-3.1 or gcc-3.2 branch using binutils cvs (neither main branch nor 2.12)]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 11:09:30PM +0100, Christian JÃ¶nsson wrote:
> Many of you guys are following the gcc lists. but here goes as well...
> 

The current binutils in CVS has 2 typos. My DT_XXX_ARRAY patch has a
fix for them.


H.J.

Previous message (by thread): [chj: Can't build libgcc/unwind-sjlj.o on neither gcc-3.1 or gcc-3.2 branch using binutils cvs (neither main branch nor 2.12)]
Next message (by thread): [chj: Can't build libgcc/unwind-sjlj.o on neither gcc-3.1 or gcc-3.2 branch using binutils cvs (neither main branch nor 2.12)]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Binutils mailing list