flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
Rainer Orth
ro@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE
Fri Dec 12 21:26:00 GMT 2003
More information about the Binutils mailing list
Fri Dec 12 21:26:00 GMT 2003
- Previous message (by thread): flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
- Next message (by thread): flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alexandre Oliva writes: > There's another reason to change from solaris2.10 to something else: > to avoid matches on say solaris2.[0-6]* from matching 2.10. > Backward-compatibility is not an argument to make it solaris2.10: it > *will* expose brokenness. We could do better by using solaris10, > since those that use solaris* will still match, and those that use > 2.[0-6]* won't inappropriately match. But as I wrote before, solaris10 will likely be wrong by the time SunOS 5.10 is released, because it will probably be called otherwise. Just stay with solaris2.* and be done with this nonsense (and discussion). Rainer
- Previous message (by thread): flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
- Next message (by thread): flag day for Solaris portions of config.{guess,sub}
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Binutils mailing list