Alan Modra amodra@bigpond.net.au
Thu Feb 27 01:17:00 GMT 2003

• Previous message (by thread): [rfa] `struct _bfd' -> `struct bfd'
• Next message (by thread): [rfa] `struct _bfd' -> `struct bfd'
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 01:48:45AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 	(_bfd): Define for backward compatibility.

Do we really need this?  Seems like you can update gdb and sim in
tandem with the rest of your change.  Other users of bfd will just
need a small and fairly obvious change if they happen to use
struct _bfd, _and_ want to use a new libbfd.

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre

---

• Previous message (by thread): [rfa] `struct _bfd' -> `struct bfd'
• Next message (by thread): [rfa] `struct _bfd' -> `struct bfd'
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

---

More information about the Binutils mailing list